There are many cool French and Italian terms for different bowing techniques. The texts have explanations of each of the different bow strokes, but these explanations range from excellent to confusing to plain contradictory (just google détaché). These terms refer to things the section does ‘under the hood.’ As an orchestrator, it is important to understand these, as they are the rudiments of string playing. Remember that in the end, though, the important thing is to know how to notate your intent; the section will take care of the technique.
When discussing bow technique it is important to note that several terms players use to describe a stroke are also terms used in notation; however, they have a slightly different meaning in this case. The two main ones to watch out for are staccato and legato, which will be discussed in this section.
The default for bowing is to play on the string and change direction with each note.
Long notes are played on the string, or shorthand on, meaning that between notes the bow does not leave the string, but rather maintains contact. The bow will change direction for each new note. If you want more than one note per stroke, use a slur to designate how many notes should fall under each bow.
How many notes you can write per bow depends on several variables. Some are non-negotiable; for example, at loud dynamics the bow must move faster to maintain a full tone, so fewer notes are possible. When the dynamic is soft, many more notes can be played and the number of changes and the speed of the bow can make some nice colors. Watch a section bow; the speed changes all the time and this is what gives the phrase life. There is a third variable: placement. Players will put the bow in slightly different positions on the string to produce different sounds. The extremes are sul ponticello and sul tasto, but there are many little variations in the middle that when combined with speed and pressure give every note a unique sound.
The reason why samples have no ‘life’ is that every note is recorded at similar speeds and pressures, so there is no relationship between technique and musical context.
The default is still to play on the string. If you want the playing heavy and on the string, you can label it marcato. Marcato is a term that refers to the attack; for strings it is performed with the martelé stroke. Notes start on the string and have a big attack due to extra pressure applied. Note that marcato does not necessarily mean short; it affects the attack, and due to the physics of how it is performed, the notes will have a separation, and so by default will be shorter. A series of marcato eighths will give the impression of being staccato. It’s important to realize the distinction though, and understand that a normal short on the string bowing is called staccato bowing.
The alternative to bowing on the string is, of course, bowing off the string. This is where the bow leaves the string between notes. The most common example of an off the string bowing style is spiccato. One common misconception is that spiccato itself is the way you label a passage as off the string. It is not. It is just one particular style of off the string bowing. However, if you do use that word and it is perhaps not the correct stroke for the phrase, players will do what they do best and adapt their bow stroke to the current musical context.
I believe the misunderstanding and misuse of the terms marcato and spiccato is due to certain string libraries using these names for their short note patches. In the real world it is impossible to play spiccato as loud and heavy as it sounds in these patches, and as mentioned above, historically marcato is a type of attack, not duration.
Spiccato is a very useful and common bow stroke, but if you look at the physics of it, it is not useful for heavier attacks and louder dynamics. For these we need more contact with the string and bouncing the bow off does not allow this. But we still want the bow to come off between notes, even if it is very slight. This is a stroke that is between a spiccato and a marcato. It is not discussed often but if you watch a section, you will see it is what naturally happens when they have to play short and heavy notes. I have also noticed that even when asked to play on the string, when the music gets fast and loud, the same thing happens and they gravitate to this same stroke, the bow seems to lift a little as it changes direction. They also often do this for clarity. In cello and bass, playing fast on the string does not project or come through as well as it does on the violin.
Under Pressure: Looking at the Bow(ie)
Notice how I have bowed the above phrase. Even though I have not marked a crescendo, there will be a slight one as the bow speed and emphasis change and the sound gets more intense. If I did mark this as a crescendo I would also want the same bowing. The louder the sound, the faster the bow has to travel to maintain a quality tone. If it were a big crescendo and I had not marked it like this they would automatically go to at least two bows per bar as the music gets louder.
There are so many subtle differences to the sound you can make when you think about the bowing.
Here is Endre Granate demonstrating these strokes.
Bowing does not always follow the phrase, but how you bow makes the phrase.
1. There is a school of thought that says you should use a long slur as a phrase mark and the section will sort it out. Yes, they can work something out, but you will get the result YOU want if you take the time to bow the passage yourself. In this case, the principal will decide how to bow it. But they do not know the music or how intense I would like each note.
2. This is how they would probably play it, starting on an up-bow of course. They may also slur C to Ab. Each bar uses the same amount of bow, and the sound will be consistent.
3. How I might do it. This will give the phrase much more life than the even bowing of #2. The more notes, the slower the bow but more pressure is applied. Fewer notes or single ones lead the bow to move faster with less pressure, giving a different intensity and some nice phrasing. So while the section will use a whole bow to cover the six beats of the Ab and G, they will use half to three quarters just for the Eb. This is what makes the music magical, and why samples have a hard time replacing the emotion of a real section.
Keep in mind that even though the notes may be slurred, there are often places where the players will have to change strings. These notes will not have the ‘slurred’ sound as the new string will not be vibrating before the next note starts. Players can work around this in many cases by playing the line in a position that avoids the string change, but if the interval is wide, this may not be possible. It is a very subtle effect, and good players will almost be able to mask it, but it is still something to think about.
In reality a good section can change bow direction without you knowing. This is very easy on the violin, but gets harder on the larger instruments. On the violin, the string is not moving very far as it vibrates, but on the bass it is moving a lot, so stopping and starting the string as the bow changes is more perceptible. A good section leader will have the section blend the bowing to avoid this issue, especially in quiet passages.
Sometimes you will not want to hear any bow changes, but only a completely smooth and even line. In order to get this effect you will need the section to change bow at different times. This can be dictated by writing two overlapping bowing patterns, one set of slurs above and one below. This will mask the changes and is sometimes referred to as ‘divisi bowing.’ In the studios we often mark the phrase with a long slur and ask the section to ‘free bow’. They will then change bow at different times, not as a group. Unfortunately ‘free bow’ is not a universal term. I have not found a common way to describe this practice, so some clarification is often needed to keep the section from bowing the line all together. If you just write a phrase mark with no other indication, the players will follow the principal.
As previously mentioned, there are many things that effect how many notes can (physically) or should (musically) go under each bow, and even the most experienced orchestrator cannot get it right all the time. Lucky for us, we are writing for humans, not computers. They can make judgement calls and adapt the bowing to suit the musical situation. So if you do screw it up, don’t worry, you are still giving the section invaluable clues as to what you are looking for.
Watching and listening is the best way to learn how to bow.
a. No emphasis, no space between notes.
b. Slight emphasis, very small space due to the bow recharging for the emphasis.
c. Detached, bow stops between strokes.
d. Heavy attack with a drop-off to a little space as the bow recharges for the next attack. You can add a tenuto to limit the space, but the accent will be less.
e. Louré, all notes under one bow. The bow pulses the notes by slowing, releasing the pressure then applying and speeding up again.
f. As above but the bow pauses between notes.
If you want an extra smooth bow change, mark it sostenuto. This is the string equivalent to legato tonguing on a wind instrument.
As stated, the default is to play on the string, so no special notation is required if that is what you want. But now we get into territory where the string terms start to mean one thing to the players, but another in notation. Staccato, when used in the score, refers to the length of the note and it does not necessarily mean to play the staccato bow stroke.
One also must be mindful when using the word legato. While generally it means to just connect the notes, it is often interpreted as meaning to slur. In Europe the legato literally means to slur. In reality, if you go with the default and have no markings, you will get legato, meaning connected but not slurred.
In my scores, if I want off the string I mark it staccato (with dots or the word stacc.). I prefer to use the word not the dots. It is cleaner, easier to change if we want to play it differently, and it keeps the notes clear for when you want to add accents. See how much less cluttered b. looks and how it could be changed to ‘on the string’ by just taking out the word stacc.
If strings are playing eighth notes at light dynamics they will play spiccato and as the dynamic gets higher or more intensity is required they will go into the ‘off-ish’ style I described above. The players adapt the bow style to the dynamic and intensity of the music, and I do not need to micro-manage them.
If I want it heavy I label it stacc. e marc. If you accent every note you have no way of getting an accent when you really want one. This is the notational equivalent to ‘crying wolf.’
I rarely use the word ‘On’ or ‘Off’ in a score; the default or the notation above implies how it should be played. If I had labeled staccato and the next section is not, I just use some tenutos or if it is repeated notes, it is safe to use legato. Have faith in your players. Provided you give them a clear starting point, they will then also listen to what is around them and come up with the best stroke for the musical situation. It often ends up that you have a combination of different strokes. This random, often unintentional blend is what gives life to the music, something that cannot be replicated with samples.
These simple indications have gotten me through hundreds of sessions, from the lightest happy cues to the loudest aggressive boss battles.
Accents are performed by adding pressure, speed, and duration to the contact of the bow and string. In the example below, the accented notes will be a little longer than the unaccented ones.
This sounds very natural and is easy to play at slow and medium tempos, up to 130 bpm or so. But when it gets faster, or if this were sixteenth notes, the effort needed to make the accents can make it difficult to keep the unaccented notes smooth and metric. When I hear this problem in the studio, I have the players only think about the accents. But it is always good to think ahead and orchestrate around this problem.
One would not think that a pattern like this would cause any trouble, and maybe to some it does not, but being a drummer, I want everything as even and metric as possible, and when I hear the violins play this the time will slightly push and pull around the accents. There are several solutions to this problem. In this case, as the accented notes are a different pitch, they will stick out anyway, so recently when this came up at a session, I just had them ignore the accents. But let’s imagine that everything is the same pitch, or the composer really wants big accents. Here is what you do –
I have taken the accents out of the first part and the seconds are just playing the accented notes. You will not miss the seconds on all the notes, and the firsts will actually be able to play more heavily now as they do not have to allow for the accents. Finally, the timing will also be perfect. The finished product will sound much better and be easier to play. If there are more than strings in the orchestra one could also add some woodwinds, perhaps an oboe with the seconds. Percussion can also help. In fact if you have percussion and brass hitting the accents, you do not need them in the strings at all, as the overall result will sound accented.
As I point out here, the players can rush many common rhythms. This is a particularly common figure in scores and at fast tempi I have found a strange thing happens. The top is the notation, the bottom is what comes out. The players have a tendency to ‘push’ on the bow change and the fingers go a little faster than the true 16th pulse. I often have to point this out and ask for a more metric and smooth performance. But note, no accent is needed in the score.
Labeling Bow Direction and Bow Position
99% of the the time this is not needed. String players have been bowing since they were four years old, and choosing to start with an up- or down-bow is second nature. In general if a phrase starts on a weak beat (a pickup, for example) that will be an up-bow. If it starts on a strong beat, that will be down, simple as that. Long notes at soft dynamics start on an up-bow as that is the easiest way to start softly. The one time it is common to label is when you want a series of heavy attacks, in which case you mark all down-bows. In reality, players are pretty good at a heavy attack in either direction, but what a series of down-bows does is ensures that there is a gap between notes as the player has to retake between each one. They will also play at the frog. More than half the time I have seen a series of down-bows written it has been ignored by the players!
The bow is held at the frog, so this is the easiest place for the player to exert the most pressure on the string. The tip is the furthest point from the hand, so consequently it is the easiest place to play with the least pressure, producing the lightest tone. Some orchestrators mark to play at the tip or frog. Just like direction, I have found the players tend to pick the best position with no input other than a dynamic. They will play a quiet tremolo at the tip, and a ff stab at the frog, because it is second nature. But should you wish to break this default, then mark it otherwise.
Ordinario (ord.) – The default, use ord. to cancel any of the following. The bow is in a neutral position, the ‘sweet spot’ between the fingerboard and the bridge. This is not a set position as it shifts depending on the string length.
Sul Tasto – On the fingerboard. The bow plays over the end of the fingerboard, producing a softer tone with a less edgy attack and less high harmonics. See below for more discussion on this technique.
Sul Ponticello (Sul Pont.) – On the bridge. Opposite sound of Sul Tasto. The bow moves closer to the bridge producing a raspy, edgy tone. There is less fundamental and more high harmonics to the sound. If you go extremely close to the bridge you can completely lose the fundamental and will only get harmonics.
Flautando – The bow moves faster than normal with a very light pressure producing a pure, flute like tone.
Col Legno – ‘With the wood‘. There are two types of col legno. Tratto is where you bow the string with the wooden part of the bow. Battuto is where the wood strikes the string. The default is battuto. Keep in mind, the sound of col legno samples is never replicated in the real world. Players do not like smashing their $10K bow into their $200K instrument. Sometimes the players might get out their 2nd, not so precious bow or I have heard of people asking them to play with rulers or pieces of dowel. It does not matter, they will hit the instrument ‘that’ hard with anything. In scores where the composer wants loud, unrealistic col legno, we usually just use the samples and don’t even try to play it. If the passage is only some isolated notes, you can substitute snap pizz. When it comes to Tratto, it hardly makes any noise, and what noise it does is not very pitched. To make this work, players usually let a little bit of bow hair contact the string. That recording where you thought you heard col legno tratto, maybe not!
Ricochet and jeté are off the string strokes where the bow plays multiple notes in one direction by bouncing. I have found these impractical for studio work unless it is just an effect. Multiple bounces at medium and fast tempi are just not precise enough for what we need in modern recording. I sometimes hear a player suggesting it as a way to play a fast, light figure and will nicely ask them to play it with separate strokes.
The Left Hand
Apart from the lowest notes on the lowest string, and the highest notes on the highest string, all other notes can be played in more than one position. The higher up the string the position is (within reason), the darker and less edgy the timbre will be. This can be notated: Sul G (‘on the G string’) passages are very common on the violin, but in many other cases this is the sort of judgement call a player will make based on the musical situation. While this has nothing to do with the bow, it affects the sound as higher positions mean shorter strings.
Sul Tasto – Not So Fasto
I have noticed from the podium that when the violins have been asked to play sul tasto, they often do not appear to be playing over the fingerboard. It was not until researching this article that I learned what was really going on. There are some technical and sonic factors to consider when playing over the fingerboard. I have heard different takes on what is happening when performers see this indication, but one thing is for sure: sul tasto is not as cut and dried as any of the books would have you think.
In the case of the violin, the strings are relatively short, so the ‘sweet spot’ where the bow makes the best sound is quite small. It is also constantly shifting depending on the hand position. As the fingers shorten the string, the sweet spot moves closer to the bridge. In fact when playing in the highest range of the violin, in order to maintain the correct ratio and thus the sweet spot, the bow is actually at the bridge. In higher positions if you really play sul tasto, the strings does not vibrate well. You are now bowing too close to the middle of the string and it is impossible to produce a good tone.
But there is more. At the bridge or in the normal position, the strings are in a nice arc that allows the player to play any string without touching the other ones with the bow. If you are playing in anything other than first position and the bow is close to or on the fingerboard, pressing the strings flattens this arc and it becomes much harder (sometimes impossible) to avoid sounding the other strings. On some violins, and the viola too, it is also possible for the bow to hit the body of the instrument when playing¬†on the outer strings. In the normal position, the bow falls right into the cutout of the body, but when you move over the fingerboard, the shape of the instrument no longer works in your favor.
The true sound of sul tasto on the violin is a wispy, almost fuzzy tone. In many cases, what we are really asking for with sul tasto is a softer, less edgy tone. Some would call it muted, but the actual sound of con sordino playing and sul tasto are not that close. There are a number of ways to create this sound. The violinists accomplish the sul tasto effect by using a combination of light bow pressure and slow bow speed. They may indeed move closer to the fingerboard depending on the pitch, but not always. As the instruments get bigger, so too does the sweet spot, and actually playing on the fingerboard becomes no problem at all. Viola has some issues similar to the violin but there are none on the cello or bass. Other techniques players use to make a softer tone include playing in a higher position on a lower string and using less hair on the string.
In the studio, players may make a judgment call in order to create a fuller sound that blends with the other instruments and projects well for the microphones, all while catching the essence of sul tasto and avoiding the technical difficulties.
Talk to players, and you’ll discover a range of opinions about this technique. In the concert hall, violinists will try for a more literal sul tasto than they do in a recording studio. As one player put it, “I would try to play a little bit over the fingerboard, just not as extreme as a conductor may want to see.” The same player also noted that everyone’s instrument is a little different, so their approach may need to be different too. The situation here seems to be similar to that of double stops or divisi, where what actually goes on has not quite filtered back to the authors of the text books.
Based on the musical surroundings, players may play sul tasto (or fake it) without being told. In fact, they are always making little adjustments, as depending on pitch, volume and context, the sweet spot may be in a different place for every note. Remember, the higher the note on the string, the closer to the bridge that sweet spot will be.
Instead of the technique being called ‘on the fingerboard’ a better definition would be ‘toward the fingerboard’. With all of this in mind, you will see that sul tasto is a type of color or effect, and not necessarily just the technique of bowing over the fingerboard.
Here is Endre Granat discussing and demonstrating the ‘sweet spot’, Sul Tasto and Sul Ponticello and Con Sordino.
thanks for the information
It is a very old post, but it relates to the question I have, and hopefully, someone will notice it here and resolve it.
I have a phrase with two eighth notes that are slurred. The second one should be short (staccato). When I write it for winds, there is no problem — two slurred notes, second one with a staccato dot above; however, one of my string musicians claims that, when there is a staccato dot above a note that is under a slur (whether beginning, middle or end of the slur), it should be articulated separately — bow is stopped. That’s not what I want; I need two notes slurred, and the second one short (staccato). My understanding (from the orchestration course I took in the 80s) was that if it is written like that (two notes slurred, second with staccato mark), they should be played exactly as I want — slurred, with second one short.
The phrasing that she is is talking about would be written (according to my understanding) with dots above both notes, or, if the first one needs to be longer, but still with a stop of the bow movement, with a tenuto dash. In other words, I write articulation as I wish notes to be played, and then add slur to indicate bowing.
I can’t attach images with actual notation, so I hope this is clear from my description.
Turn the second note into a 16th rather than use a dot over the second 8th note and you’ll get what you want. HTH
Really excellent article?Äîthank you. Your website has become a frequent “turn-to” resource for me.
I have a question about bow marks for phrases with using notes with stems in different directions. Notes with stems up have bow markings underneath, and vice versa for downward stems?Äîthis is clear. Hard to ask question without writing musical example?Äîbut is it generally the case that for stems in different directions, it’s the last note of the phrase which determines whether bow marking is underneath or over the notes? This is what I’m seeing in traditional scores?Äînot always, but mostly?Äîand in one of your examples above, the one in the section “Under Pressure”, the second bar, since the last note is with stem down, the bow marking is above the phrase. Wondering if there’s some solid rule about this issue.
Many thanks in advance.
I gather you are referring to the slur markings? In that case I put it where it looks the neatest. Starting with note side, so same place you would put an articulation, but then adapting for cleanliness.
Do you know how many bowing techniques there are in the world and what the most popular ones are that are used most?
Hi, I don’t know everything, that is for the players to know. I know enough. I think I covered what orchestrators need to know and understand. Check out the videos of Endre demonstrating them.
Hello Tim – I am an aspiring composer and have learned a lot from your blogs which really do fill in the holes left by the textbooks so thanks a lot for providing them! Can you help with one point which I am struggling with? I understand that slurs on string scores are bowing directions not phrase marks. That’s fine for comparatively small groups of notes which are to be played on one bow but what about a much longer passage? I have written a piece which ends with two eighth notes followed by four dotted half notes (metronome marking 72). Presumably all these notes could not be played in one single bowing movement so how do I decide where to indicate the change of bowing? Any advice gratefully received thanks.
If it is soft, they could all be played under one. If you do want a legato sound, you could just put a big slur, the section will change direction when they need to. It is not something to stress about. They are very intelligent! They will make it work. Convey your idea and they adapt.
Just discovered this blog after listening to the episode of Scorecast you appeared on (Which I also recently discovered). Thank you so much for this blog! It’s so refreshing to hear about orchestration from someone who does it all the time in real life situations. One quick question I wasn’t quite clear about. When indicating marcato should you use the marcato articulation mark as you would in other instruments; that is the teepee looking mark? I have seen other texts say to use an accent and staccato marking. I’m aware that if it’s for an entire passage you could simply write marc. I’m mostly asking about a situation in which you would want it for a few notes only. Thank you so much!
I sometimes use the cap (marcato articulation). As you say, if it is a few notes, or one that I want to stick out. In my experience it gets the same result as a staccato accent. To some people, and for sure jazz musicians, the cap also means short. They will then play a short 1/4 with a cap, but some not, so I use a staccato accent in those situations to make it clear. However, in jazz, I use the cap all the time. You do sometimes see old scores with caps on longer notes. This is technically fine, as marcato does not mean short, just marked, but the accent has become the common articulation for that.
My answer — different from Tim’s — would be never to write a cap in a string part. It’s not technically incorrect, but it’s *very* uncommon (perhaps because it looks too much like an up-bow sign). Since string players so rarely see caps, if you write them — even in a jazz score — you will not get consistent results. Use some other less ambiguous marking instead.
[…] longer than it is in the brass, which is especially noticeable when strings are performing tremolo. The accent requires a lot of momentum and it is hard to then lose that in order to drop back to p. I often just give the strings an […]
Wonderful article! Thank you so much for sharing your vast experience on the subject. Just one quick correction: ord. stands for “ordinario” (Italian for ordinary) not for “ordinale.”
Fixed, thanks for pointing it out.
What a great blog! Thanks for taking the time to share your knowledge.